W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2009

Re: [css3-background] fallback color on background-image

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:21:16 -0800
To: CSS WG <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20090220212116.GA19962@pickering.dbaron.org>
On Friday 2009-02-20 13:16 -0800, L. David Baron wrote:
>  * require that you can't specify background-size in the shorthand
>    without also specifying background-position (so that you can't
>    use the '/' separating background-position and background size
>    and simultaneously omit background-position)

To be clear, this would probably be my preference.

It would also require that we not reintroduce the ability to say
"background-color: / red" as a synonym for "background-color:
transparent / red", at least in the shorthand (although I'd sort of
prefer forbidding it in the longhand too; I don't it's particularly
readable).

-David

-- 
L. David Baron                                 http://dbaron.org/
Mozilla Corporation                       http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Friday, 20 February 2009 21:21:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:16 GMT