W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2009

Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2009-02-04: box-shadow and border-image

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:22:56 -0800
Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style@w3.org
Message-Id: <3043D5B9-AA20-4F8A-9338-BB0E40A899D0@gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>

On Feb 5, 2009, at 8:55 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:

> because there is a legitimate reason to
> *specify* both (fallback behavior, to provide a shadow when the
> border-image isn't being used,

Ah, another good point. I might specify box-shadow for a general class  
("my-boxes") and an image-border on several more specific classes  
(such as "my-scallop-cornered-boxes"), and it would be convenient to  
do so without having to include "box-shadow:none" on all the more  
specific classes.

Fallback behavior is the biggest reason though, IMO.
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2009 17:23:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:23 UTC