W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2009

Re: [css3-2d-transforms] animation of skewX(), skewY(), skew()

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:06:53 -0800
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <20091202220653.GA22447@pickering.dbaron.org>
On Wednesday 2009-12-02 16:03 -0600, Brendan Kenny wrote:
> Would it make more sense to introduce a shear() function instead,
> where the parameter is a <length> value? Another alternative, though
> not standard nomenclature, would be to overload skew() with a length
> unit.

*If* we do introduce it, I think it should take a <number> rather
than a <length>.  (This would mean that a point a length A from the
axis gets sheared the length number * A parallel to the axis.)


L. David Baron                                 http://dbaron.org/
Mozilla Corporation                       http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Wednesday, 2 December 2009 22:07:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:30 UTC