W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2009

Re: [css3-2d-transforms] animation of skewX(), skewY(), skew()

From: Brendan Kenny <bckenny@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 16:14:55 -0600
Message-ID: <ab96c3ef0912021414m50586548xe4ca7e58834466d7@mail.gmail.com>
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Yes, very good point. It's a ratio, not a distance.

On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 4:06 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:
> On Wednesday 2009-12-02 16:03 -0600, Brendan Kenny wrote:
>> Would it make more sense to introduce a shear() function instead,
>> where the parameter is a <length> value? Another alternative, though
>> not standard nomenclature, would be to overload skew() with a length
>> unit.
>
> *If* we do introduce it, I think it should take a <number> rather
> than a <length>.  (This would mean that a point a length A from the
> axis gets sheared the length number * A parallel to the axis.)
>
> -David
>
> --
> L. David Baron                                 http://dbaron.org/
> Mozilla Corporation                       http://www.mozilla.com/
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 2 December 2009 22:15:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:22 GMT