- From: Zack Weinberg <zweinberg@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:57:53 -0700
- To: Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style@w3.org
Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com> wrote: > >> <uri> is either an url() function or an argumento to url() [i.e., > >> url() is optional] > > > > Don't do this either. > > > > [ the URI token is very special, and its specialness should not > > infect any more of the grammar ] > > Well, it's in the proposed draft for image(), so I thought it could be > taken to a more generalized form ... I formally objected to that part of the image() spec, too. [ The thing I *would* support is changing every use of the URI token to accept a bare STRING also, and then deprecating URI. ] zw
Received on Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:58:50 UTC