W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2009

Re: [CSS3] content, background-image and fallbacks

From: Zack Weinberg <zweinberg@mozilla.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:57:53 -0700
To: Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <20090819115753.3febe392@mozilla.com>
Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> <uri> is either an url() function or an argumento to url() [i.e.,
> >> url() is optional]
> >
> > Don't do this either.
> >
> > [ the URI token is very special, and its specialness should not
> > infect any more of the grammar ]
> 
> Well, it's in the proposed draft for image(), so I thought it could be
> taken to a more generalized form ...

I formally objected to that part of the image() spec, too.

[ The thing I *would* support is changing every use of the URI token to
accept a bare STRING also, and then deprecating URI. ]

zw
Received on Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:58:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:20 GMT