W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2009

Re: [CSS3] content, background-image and fallbacks

From: Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:52:21 +0200
Message-ID: <cb7bb73a0908191152i72db2c7cx145124962fb7b482@mail.gmail.com>
To: Zack Weinberg <zweinberg@mozilla.com>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Zack Weinberg<zweinberg@mozilla.com> wrote:
> Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com> wrote:
>> One thing that _could_ be done would be extend the url() syntax to be
>>
>> url(<uri> [<mimetype>] [,<uri> [<mimetype>]*)
>
> No changes to url() whatsoever, please.

Yep, I wouldn't like it either.

>> <uri> is either an url() function or an argumento to url() [i.e.,
>> url() is optional]
>
> Don't do this either.
>
> [ the URI token is very special, and its specialness should not infect
> any more of the grammar ]

Well, it's in the proposed draft for image(), so I thought it could be
taken to a more generalized form ...

-- 
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
Received on Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:53:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:20 GMT