W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2009

Re: [CSS3] content, background-image and fallbacks

From: Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:57:41 +0200
Message-ID: <cb7bb73a0908191257y58a17af8k22b730b1033368c6@mail.gmail.com>
To: Zack Weinberg <zweinberg@mozilla.com>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Zack Weinberg<zweinberg@mozilla.com> wrote:
> Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> <uri> is either an url() function or an argumento to url() [i.e.,
>> >> url() is optional]
>> >
>> > Don't do this either.
>> >
>> > [ the URI token is very special, and its specialness should not
>> > infect any more of the grammar ]
>>
>> Well, it's in the proposed draft for image(), so I thought it could be
>> taken to a more generalized form ...
>
> I formally objected to that part of the image() spec, too.
>
> [ The thing I *would* support is changing every use of the URI token to
> accept a bare STRING also, and then deprecating URI. ]

Could you clarify this part a bit for me please? It is my
understanding that URI tokens are essentially a "reduced character
set" strings. Are you proposing to lift this restriction, or something
else?

-- 
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
Received on Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:58:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:20 GMT