W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2008

Re: [CSS21] stack level definitions in 9.9.1

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 07:42:37 +0000 (UTC)
To: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0810210738140.1041@hixie.dreamhostps.com>

On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Ian Hickson wrote:
> 
> The technical disagreement (section 2.10) is based on a misunderstanding 
> of the spec. The section refers to "all floated dependants or only for 
> non-positioned floated dependants" but in CSS a float cannot be 
> positioned, making the distinction moot.

My bad; as David Baron just pointed out to me, relatively positioned 
floats are possible, so in fact the list in section 9.9.1 will need fixing 
as well (items 3, 4, and 5 all need "non-positioned").

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 21 October 2008 07:43:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:15 GMT