Håkon Wium Lie wrote: > Indeed. I meant to continue using the term "super-scripted glyphs". > The full sentence then becomes: > > Using super-scripted glyphs is optional; UAs may also scale and > position other glyphs for use in footnote calls. > > Let me know if there are better suggestions. Is perhaps "superscript glyphs" (with or without hyphen) perhaps better than "supercripted ...", since to me "supercripted" automatically encompasses the case that you go on to describe ("UAs may also scale and position other glyphs for use in footnote calls"), whereas "superscript glyphs" seems to me to refer to glyphs specifically intended for use as superscripts. Philip TAYLORReceived on Tuesday, 14 October 2008 23:15:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:15 GMT