W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2008

Re: [css3-gcpm] More feedback

From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:27:13 +0200
Message-ID: <18677.46961.262269.182672@opera.com>
To: "Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>

Also sprach Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd):

 > > Indeed. I meant to continue using the term "super-scripted glyphs".
 > > The full sentence then becomes:
 > > 
 > >   Using super-scripted glyphs is optional; UAs may also scale and
 > >   position other glyphs for use in footnote calls.
 > > 
 > > Let me know if there are better suggestions.
 > 
 > Is perhaps "superscript glyphs" (with or without hyphen) perhaps
 > better than "supercripted ...", since to me "supercripted"
 > automatically encompasses the case that you go on to describe ("UAs
 > may also scale and position other glyphs for use in footnote
 > calls"), whereas "superscript glyphs" seems to me to refer to
 > glyphs specifically intended for use as superscripts.

I agree and will make the change.

Thanks,

-h&kon
              Håkon Wium Lie                          CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com                  http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2008 09:28:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:15 GMT