W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2008

Re: [css3-gcpm] More feedback

From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:05:08 +0200
Message-ID: <18677.6036.341581.16544@opera.com>
To: "Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>

Also sprach Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd):

 > > I suggest this text:
 > > 
 > >   Using super-sized glyphs is optional; UAs may also scale and
 > >   position other glyphs for use in footnote calls.
 > 
 > "super-sized glyphs" is horribly ambiguous : I suspect
 > you mean "superscript-sized glyphs", which are smaller
 > than "regular" glyphs, but "super" in general (and,
 > in particular, "super size", as in "super size me" [1]
 > means larger than normal ...

Indeed. I meant to continue using the term "super-scripted glyphs".
The full sentence then becomes:

  Using super-scripted glyphs is optional; UAs may also scale and
  position other glyphs for use in footnote calls.

Let me know if there are better suggestions.

Cheers,

-h&kon
              Håkon Wium Lie                          CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com                  http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2008 22:06:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:15 GMT