- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:05:08 +0200
- To: "Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Also sprach Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd):
> > I suggest this text:
> >
> > Using super-sized glyphs is optional; UAs may also scale and
> > position other glyphs for use in footnote calls.
>
> "super-sized glyphs" is horribly ambiguous : I suspect
> you mean "superscript-sized glyphs", which are smaller
> than "regular" glyphs, but "super" in general (and,
> in particular, "super size", as in "super size me" [1]
> means larger than normal ...
Indeed. I meant to continue using the term "super-scripted glyphs".
The full sentence then becomes:
Using super-scripted glyphs is optional; UAs may also scale and
position other glyphs for use in footnote calls.
Let me know if there are better suggestions.
Cheers,
-h&kon
Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2008 22:06:12 UTC