W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2008

Re: CSS3 @font-face / EOT Fonts - new compromise proposal

From: Dave Crossland <dave@lab6.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 23:27:46 +0000
Message-ID: <2285a9d20811111527j49c4c417k93af19207c087946@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Dave Singer" <singer@apple.com>
Cc: www-style@w3.org

2008/11/11 Dave Singer <singer@apple.com>:
> [remaining clear that this is merely a summary of what I think I read, not a
> proposal]
> I think it's that we have to admit that both restricted-use and free fonts
> may exist, and those making restricted-use fonts want there to be some
> indications and support for the restrictions, and those making/using free
> fonts think that there should not be such indications or tech. support for
> (non-existent) restrictions.

As a free software font maker, if restricted fonts show indications
they are restricted, I want my unrestricted fonts to show indications
they are not restricted.

http://basiscraft.com/notices.html is a sketch of a way to handle such


"Nothing would please me more than being able to hire ten programmers
and deluge the hobby market with good software."
- Bill Gates, 1976, in want of www.gnuherds.org
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2008 23:28:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:41 UTC