Mikko Rantalainen wrote: >> There is a subtle definitional difference here. For example <a >> href="..."> would match your definition of :interactive but does NOT >> match the current definition of :enabled (on purpose). > > Why is that? Because links can't be disabled, and the spec explicitly says that anything that's :enabled can be :disabled under other circumstances. If you mean why does it say _that_, then I don't know offhand. And it doesn't matter much, because this language is going away anyway. -BorisReceived on Monday, 10 November 2008 13:55:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:16 GMT