W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2008

Re: [cssom-view] small update

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:58:23 +1300
Message-ID: <11e306600803091258u802b17cv11af7cf6dc304e75@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Garrett Smith" <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com>
Cc: "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
> wrote:
> >
> >  * Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> >  >   http://dev.w3.org/csswg/cssom-view/
> >
> >
> >  There are many terms that you use, like content width, context box
> with,
> >  associated CSS layout box, and current rendering mode, that you never
> >  properly introduce. Links to their definitions would be very useful.
> >
> That is a very good point, Bjoern, and one I noticed, too.
>
> The danger is that these props appear to be analagous to properties
> that have been the source of pain for web developers. Particularly the
> currentStyle.hasLayout .
>

There is nothing like that here. Your speculation is baseless, please
actually read the spec.

Rob
-- 
"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah
53:5-6]
Received on Sunday, 9 March 2008 19:58:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:55:02 GMT