- From: Ph. Wittenbergh <jk7r-obt@asahi-net.or.jp>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:30:53 +0900
- To: W3C Style List <www-style@w3.org>
On Jul 9, 2008, at 8:17 AM, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: > While we are on this page (http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-color/#transparency > ) ... > > Can we change: > > "Conceptually, after the element (including its children) is > rendered into an RGBA offscreen image, the opacity setting specifies > how to blend the offscreen rendering into the current composite > rendering." > > to > > "Conceptually, after the element (including its *in-flow* children) > is rendered into an RGBA offscreen image, the opacity setting > specifies how to blend the offscreen rendering into the current > composite rendering." > > note *in-flow* there. Why should that be limited to in-flow elements ? > [...] > > Renders in: > FF3 and Safari - div.kid as not transparent. > Opera - div.kid as transparent. In Gecko 1.9 (fx 3) and WebKit, the div.kid _is_ transparent. The whole block as one unit is made transparent. In Opera, the parent and the kid are made transparent as separate units (I think). A variant of your test case: <http://dev.l-c-n.com/css3/ap-opacity3.html> using a couple of background images to visualise the transparency. Philippe --- Philippe Wittenbergh http://l-c-n.com/
Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2008 01:31:34 UTC