W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2008

Re: [css3-background] background-size vs background-stretch

From: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 12:04:16 +0100
Message-Id: <A947251A-EC9D-45E9-9375-7153E6EFB5F8@crissov.de>
To: CSS Style <www-style@w3.org>

> Molly E. Holzschlag wrote:
>> background-fill  (this one is pretty darned intuitive)
> If I were guessing, I'd think it means "ways to take this image and  
> make it fill the background area", not "size to make image before  
> using it as a tile".

Why not |background-tile| then?

JFTR, I prefer |background-sizing| over |background-size|. The latter  
suggests the coverage area relative to the whole background area for me.
Received on Saturday, 19 January 2008 11:04:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:33 UTC