Font technologies like Open Type and AAT provide a number of advanced typographic features, i.e. stuff known from print or handwriting, but uncommon to electronic typesetting. Not all of them have counterparts in CSS yet. Should they? How? CSS would either provide a generic interface for selecting features by the author or new properties and values would be inspired of what is made available by the specifications (whether or not font designers and text rendering library developers choose to implement). table {font-style: option("tnum")} or code {ligation: none;} kbd>kbd {glyph-style: isolated;} /* a key */ table {number-style: tabular non-lining;} .sig {font-family: cursive; serif-style: swash; ligation: full;} ... PS: As far as I know there is nothing like italics in East-Asian typography. Oblique can be simulated by automatic slanting. Would it be acceptable for Japanese to switch display between Katakana and Hiragana for "font-style: italic"?Received on Saturday, 19 January 2008 12:58:52 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:58 GMT