W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2008

RE: [css3-grid] updated draft

From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@exchange.microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:36:47 -0800
To: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <04F36FB4ED0F85459AA447F72711526F012543815B82@DF-GRTDANE-MSG.exchange.corp.microsoft.com>

It is an interesting alternative, similar to display:table/display:table-column. There is a precedent for elements that have no visualization but carry data for another element.

I still have a preference to represent layout attributes purely in CSS language. It seems to be a better match to philosophy of CSS - you don't need to make any changes to semantic document to change its appearance...

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Fedoniouk [mailto:news@terrainformatica.com]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 10:42 PM

I propose to:

1) drop grid-columns/grid-rows attributes all together. Introduce
additional value to the display attribute - grid instead.
(Better to use another attribute for child layout methods - like
used to be 'display-model' or 'flow')


Example, simple 2*2 grid with three cells, last one (in second row)
spans two columns:

<div style="display:grid">
   <p style="left:1gr;top:1gr;"> 1.1 </p>
   <p style="left:2gr;top:1gr;"> 1.2 </p>
   <p style="top:2gr;"> 2 </p>

And famous content/sidebars example:

<body style="display:grid">
   <div style="top:1gr; left:1gr;"> left sidebar </div>
   <div style="top:1gr; left:3gr;"> right sidebar </div>
   <div style="top:1gr; left:2gr; width:1*;"> content </div>
Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2008 05:37:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:33 UTC