Good, I like that re-casting, but it leaves undefined the behaviour of a browser that supports "run-in" but not "inline"; that situation, too, deserves clarification, IMHO ... Philip Taylor -------- Adam Kuehn wrote: > > >> When I was reading the text, I saw an inconsistency. I attached the >> partition that I saw the problem, in jpeg format. > > > > I would recommend recasting that text (Section 4.3.8 Unsupported Values, > the text immediately following the example) to avoid ambiguity as follows: > > "A UA that supports both 'inline' and 'run-in' values for the display > property will accept the first display declaration and then "write over" > that value with the second display declaration. A UA that supports the > 'inline' value but not the 'run-in' value will accept the first display > declaration and ignore the second." > >Received on Friday, 3 February 2006 17:16:52 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:43 GMT