W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2006

Re: XBL in CSS

From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:03:56 +1000
Message-ID: <44E3F8BC.6090703@lachy.id.au>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
CC: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style@w3.org

Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:33:45 -0700, David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com> wrote:
>> IMO the binding property is simple and well-specified.  I don't really 
>> see a need for additional complexity in the CSS syntax.
> 
> Note that he's proposing an additional feature, as I understand it. I 
> suppose that doing @binding url() will load the binding document and 
> than for each binding associate it with the element given in element="" 
> attribute.

Yes, that's correct.  I have no problem with the 'binding' property, 
though I did share Fantasai's concerns about the loops caused by using 
:bound-element { binding:none; }.

-- 
Lachlan Hunt
http://lachy.id.au/
Received on Thursday, 17 August 2006 05:04:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:46 GMT