W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2006

Re: Proposed ::last-line and ::last-letter selectors

From: Andrés <adelfino@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:13:13 -0300
Message-ID: <4d90013f0608150813g71282d96y286e0c931daa856b@mail.gmail.com>
To: www-style@w3.org
That blinking "_" would be an effect, so, it's a style thing. I
wouldn't want my visitors to see it if they chose not to see style
content.

On 8/15/06, Alastair Campbell <ac@alastc.com> wrote:
>
> Andrés wrote:
> > You ask for a use, I gave you an use.
>
> A use which would be better implemented without CSS.
>
> > WAI guideline says that? well, stop putting blink as an option for
> > text-decoration.
>
> I believe that's the case:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-fonts/#font-effect-prop
>
> Bit late for CSS 1/2 though.
>
> > And no, it isn't better a gif, it can't be scaled, a simple character is
> > better.
>
> A GIF (or PNG) with a width defined in EMs would scale (reasonable well
> I believe), not to mention vector based formats (e.g. Flash, SVG). I
> would consider an animated GIF easiest to produce though.
>
> > Sincerely, I can't understand you.
>
> I think I've ground to a halt on this one, apologies for the list for
> extending it this long.
>
> -Alastair
>
>


-- 
Andrés Delfino
Received on Tuesday, 15 August 2006 15:13:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:46 GMT