Andrés wrote: > You ask for a use, I gave you an use. A use which would be better implemented without CSS. > WAI guideline says that? well, stop putting blink as an option for > text-decoration. I believe that's the case: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-fonts/#font-effect-prop Bit late for CSS 1/2 though. > And no, it isn't better a gif, it can't be scaled, a simple character is > better. A GIF (or PNG) with a width defined in EMs would scale (reasonable well I believe), not to mention vector based formats (e.g. Flash, SVG). I would consider an animated GIF easiest to produce though. > Sincerely, I can't understand you. I think I've ground to a halt on this one, apologies for the list for extending it this long. -AlastairReceived on Tuesday, 15 August 2006 15:07:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:22:31 GMT