Anne van Kesteren wrote: > You could have 'contenteditable' which becomes 'xhtml:contenteditable' > where > 'xhtml' is bound to 'http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml' when not applied to an > element in that namespace. That way you would be compatible with existing > implementations and use it for other markup languages as well. Anne, I don't care about the technical solution at this time. I am just dealing with the requirements: copy/paste must preserve editability if needed, w/o having to resolve, factorize and rewrite selectors or XPath between two document instances (do s/editability/presentation and you have the best argument for the existence of the style attibute). In other words, using a steamroller to kill an ant is not a good solution. </Daniel>Received on Friday, 30 September 2005 16:28:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:40 GMT