- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:19:00 +0200
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Quoting Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>: > I said xml:editable as I could say foobar:editable as soon as foobar > namespace > is a generic inclusion for all xml dialects. We're speaking of something that > is completely dialect-agnostic here. You could have 'contenteditable' which becomes 'xhtml:contenteditable' where 'xhtml' is bound to 'http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml' when not applied to an element in that namespace. That way you would be compatible with existing implementations and use it for other markup languages as well. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Friday, 30 September 2005 16:19:06 UTC