Quoting Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>: > I said xml:editable as I could say foobar:editable as soon as foobar > namespace > is a generic inclusion for all xml dialects. We're speaking of something that > is completely dialect-agnostic here. You could have 'contenteditable' which becomes 'xhtml:contenteditable' where 'xhtml' is bound to 'http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml' when not applied to an element in that namespace. That way you would be compatible with existing implementations and use it for other markup languages as well. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>Received on Friday, 30 September 2005 16:19:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:40 GMT