W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2005

Re: Italics and emphasis (was: Re: Five new proposals about CSS)

From: J David Eisenberg <catcode@catcode.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 12:09:21 -0500 (CDT)
To: Orion Adrian <orion.adrian@gmail.com>
cc: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0510161202380.17926-100000@plus36.host4u.net>

On Sun, 16 Oct 2005, Orion Adrian wrote:

> 
> Is there some point where we say marking up a poem or even ascii art
> is something that can be reasonably done with normal semantics. Are
> they not a category all to themselves? Perhaps we should recommend
> that poems simply be given their own subset of markup or we should
> simply leave their domain alone.

I think that I shall never guess
How poems look with CSS.

A poem with its <em> and <strong>
Where <b> and <i> might best belong.

Specs are made by W3,
Semantics are by you and me.

-- 
J. David Eisenberg  http://catcode.com/
Received on Sunday, 16 October 2005 17:09:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:41 GMT