W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2005

Re: CSS selectors and xml:id

From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 20:31:14 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <200505091931.j49JVEM01666@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
To: www-style@w3.org

> Two interoperable implementations means that there are two 
> implementations which implement *every* feature of the specification in 
> an interoperable way. You can't say those two implementations support 

I don't think CSS would ever become a standard if that definition is true,
especially given that CSS only hints presentation.

My understanding is that the requirement is applied feature by feature,
not for the whole language.  The aim is to form a crude test that the
specification in unambiguous, and physically implementable, not to create
a market by forcing there to be at least two complete implementations, or
to give any guarantee of pixel perfect reproducibility across user agents.
Received on Monday, 9 May 2005 19:31:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:37 GMT