W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2005

Re: [css3-background], comments on 'border-radius'

From: [ Adrien Leygues ] <aleygues@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:26:50 +0100
Message-ID: <815968ec05021702263bdcb20f@mail.gmail.com>
To: www-style@w3.org

> On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 23:47:46 -0800, Andrew Fedoniouk 
> Under the light of border-image: do we need border-radius at all?


french webMaker over there. This is my very first post on that list. 

> To be implemented with good quality on media:screen rounded corners should
> use
> antialiasing.  

You are right. Gecko engine already supports rounded-corners, and for
exemple, it renders pretty good on that blog :

> No other module in CSS requires AA. Of course if SVG is not a
> part of renderer.

Does "AA" relates to the level of accessibilty ? if so, may i ask you
to explain me the relation between CSS and AA in that case ?

> I think that specialized tools like XaraX will produce better bitmaps with
> rounded corners than any CSS renderer in runtime.

Yes but, as you underline it, there may be some problems with
backgrounds. To use vector (scalable) graphics we need the browser to
support it. It's could be a good idea so we can avoid some extra tags
used to insert rounder-borders as background.

> Andrew Fedoniouk.
> http://terrainformatica.com

[ Adrien Leygues ]
I've got some google accounts to spread, just ask...
Received on Thursday, 17 February 2005 13:07:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:17 UTC