W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2005

Re: [CSS3 Backgrounds and Borders Module] : 1 pixel corner color

From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 23:30:02 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <200508242230.j7OMU2p06648@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
To: www-style@w3.org

> rules. (border-right and border-bottom). If they "conflict" (meaning the UA
> has to choose between the two / half-and-haf rendering is not possible), the
> latter rule must be followed?

I think this is trying to say that the order of appearence in the style
sheet affects the result even when it doesn't change the cascade.  This
would seem to require including the position in the style sheet in the
computed value of the attribue, something for I don't believe there is
precedent, and which I suspect is not supported in current implementations'
attributes data structures.

Also, how would !important interact.

> In this case, the lower right pixel would be red (following border-bottom)
> and the lower left pixel would be blue (following border-left).
Received on Wednesday, 24 August 2005 22:31:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:20 UTC