- From: Emrah BASKAYA <emrahbaskaya@hesido.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 01:17:34 +0300
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 21:19:18 +0000 (UTC), Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
> The above is unnecessary. Just do:
>
> body {
> background-color: white;
>
> /* CSS2 */
> background-image: url('main_bg.png');
> background-position: top left;
> background-repeat: repeat
>
> /* CSS3 */
> background-image: url('flower.png'), url('ball.png'),
> url('main_bg.png');
> background-position: bottom right, center, top left
> background-repeat: no-repeat, no-repeat, repeat
> }
>
> ...and it'll work exactly as you wanted it to. Any UA that spports the
> multiple-value syntax will use the second set, and any compliant UA that
> doesn't will use the first set instead.
>
It may be correct for this example because it uses multiple-value syntax,
but what about other properties? (just repeat the same propery using
commas trick?) and let's remember most think that we need more than a CSS3
scheme, the discussion shifted to "Conditional CSS sections based on
property support".
--
Emrah BASKAYA
www.hesido.com
Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2005 22:17:41 UTC