Anne, > The only reason I can see is for the "borders" of an area. However, we > could use 'border-image' or a similar property to do that. > You could also use '::before' and '::after', though some W3C Members > think you are abusing the selectors if you use them for a top and bottom > background image. > I don't really see a reason to introduce this new feature. Multiple border images would be nice--that would make it easier to have fluid widths with custom border images--but another advantage could be corners. For example, it would be nice to be able to have a style definition that adds rounded corner images to text box backgrounds; that seems to me like it would be a better use of CSS than tacking on rounded-corner strip graphics before and after text boxes, which could result in the appearance of different text box padding when some browsers do not support ::before and ::after (the top and bottom padding would be less than actually desired to make up for the image heights). Kind regards, Brian SextonReceived on Sunday, 14 November 2004 20:36:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:34 GMT