- From: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 12:27:35 -0700
- To: "Chris Lilley" <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: "Max Romantschuk" <max@provico.fi>, <www-style@w3.org>
Hi, Chris, (don't shoot, I agree that SVG is a best choice from feature set point of view) > AF> But images for gradient fill are not so good to be compressed effectively. > > This is incorrect. Even for raster images, PNG and to an extent JPEG > are able to compress a vertical gradient well and a horizontal > gradient moderately well. GIF can't, but, well, its not a very good > format. I agree. I am using "not so good" which I guess means "good, but not perfect". Good for vertical gradients. Not so good for any other types of gradients. Andrew Fedoniouk. http://terrainformatica.com PS: Have you seen site of Max Shemanarev http://www.antigrain.com/ and his SVG renderer? Just for your information.
Received on Monday, 10 May 2004 15:30:16 UTC