Hi, Chris, (don't shoot, I agree that SVG is a best choice from feature set point of view) > AF> But images for gradient fill are not so good to be compressed effectively. > > This is incorrect. Even for raster images, PNG and to an extent JPEG > are able to compress a vertical gradient well and a horizontal > gradient moderately well. GIF can't, but, well, its not a very good > format. I agree. I am using "not so good" which I guess means "good, but not perfect". Good for vertical gradients. Not so good for any other types of gradients. Andrew Fedoniouk. http://terrainformatica.com PS: Have you seen site of Max Shemanarev http://www.antigrain.com/ and his SVG renderer? Just for your information.Received on Monday, 10 May 2004 15:30:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:29 GMT