W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2004

Re: thoughts on non-compliant browsers

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 19:18:30 -0500
Message-Id: <200403080018.i280IVsv002264@nerd-xing.mit.edu>
To: Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com>
Cc: www-style@w3.org

> OK, I must not be making my point clearly. I am saying we have 
> designated part of the view to be held at one font-size (large).

I understand that.  And CSS gives users the ability to override anything you
say in your stylesheet with !important rules in a user stylesheet.  I'm not
quite sure whether you understand that....

> The font zoom does not scale up the background-image.

Yes, because it's a _font_ zoom.  It simply sets the equivalent of !important
font-size rules in the user stylesheet, like I said.

It seems that your only issue is that Mozilla implements a font zoom, not a
whole-page zoom (a la Opera).  That has nothing to do with CSS, however.

> a pixel is a pixel. it does not resize unless you change your resolution.

I'm sorry, but that's not true in CSS.  For example, in CSS a pixel resizes if
you change your viewing distance.  I recommend giving the CSS definition of
pixel a read:
<http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-CSS21-20040225/syndata.html#pixel-units>.

Boris
-- 
Isn't it interesting that the same people who laugh at
science fiction listen to weather forecasts and
economists?
                          -- Kelvin Throop III
Received on Sunday, 7 March 2004 19:18:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:27 GMT