W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2004

Re: thoughts on non-compliant browsers

From: Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 16:11:05 -0800
Message-ID: <404BBA19.2000109@koberg.com>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Cc: www-style@w3.org

Boris Zbarsky wrote:

> 
> I read your post most carefully, thank you.  If the text is large, then the
> users won't have issues reading it and won't zoom and there won't be a problem,
> right?  After all, it's not like the font zoom will accidentally end up zoomed
> from the last time they used the browser, or something.

OK, I must not be making my point clearly. I am saying we have 
designated part of the view to be held at one font-size (large). The 
rest of the page can be resized at will. The font zoom does not scale up 
the background-image. The result in mozilla is that the text overflowing 
does not display.


> 
> On the other hand, if the users can't read your text even at the size it's at,
> then surely it's better for them to be able to read it after all then for them
> to simply give up on trying to read your page?
> 
> 
>>Pixel font sizes is the problem we face if we want mozilla to render the 
>>page correctly.
> 
> 
> Yes, but like I said nothing makes pixel font sizes special.
> 

a pixel is a pixel. it does not resize unless you change your resolution.
Received on Sunday, 7 March 2004 19:08:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:27 GMT