W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2004

Re: [css3-speech] Comments: 'cue-before', 'cue-after', and 'cue'

From: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:51:41 +0100 (BST)
To: csant <csant@csant.info>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0407301350350.2861@holly>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 28 Jul 2004, csant wrote:

> 
> As mentioned in my mail about 'voice-balance', there currently is
> a limitation in where to place a 'cue' in a two-channel output
> indipendently
>  from voice-balance.
> 
> It would be nice to add a 'cue-balance' property which would take
> the same values as 'voice-balance'. Alteratively I would like to
> see the 'voice-' prefix dropped from 'voice-balance' to simply be
> 'balance' (or, if a composite name is needed, 'sound-balance') -
> of course this would result in much less means to style a page
> aurally.

Since the voice-balance property does apply to both cues and
synthetic speech, a cue-balance property would be redundant.

Regards,
- -- 
 Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>  W3C lead for voice and multimodal.
 http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett +44 1225 866240 (or 867351)
 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBCkRjb3AdEmxAsUsRAp7IAKC3zDa7Dkhmcw60TD3UtHCr3jFyXACgvaQ/
PDHKEUOAvAzXmncT4K/M0GY=
=cLiJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 30 July 2004 08:51:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:31 GMT