W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2004

[css3-reader] compared to aural

From: Phil Baines <phil@gnasp.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:02:50 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <403E5EFA.1030402@gnasp.com>
To: www-style@w3.org


What would the difference be to having a 'reader' media type, to the 
currently existing 'aural' media type? Surly screen readers should be 
encouraged to use the 'aural' media type. especially considering that 
all the reader related styles are in fact called 'aural styles' are they 

Apologies if I am completely off the mark with this one. I am rather new 
to CSS in the grand scale of things.

Phil Baines
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2004 18:29:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:27:11 UTC