W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2004

Re: Wording issue in definition of line-height

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 15:45:40 -0400
Message-ID: <4082DAE4.4030803@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org

Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> 
> The definition of line-height [1] says:
...
> This doesn't make it clear what the "minimal height" mentioned actually 
> does.  As far as I can tell, the line box height calculation algorithm 
> [2] should include another step:
> 
>   4.  If the resulting height is smaller than the minimal height of line
>       boxes for this block, as specified by the __line-height__
>       property, the height is increased to be said minimal height.
> 
...
> There is the issue of specifying exactly what happens to the baseline 
> and what happens to vertical alignment when step 4 is applied as above. 
...
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visudet.html#propdef-line-height
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visudet.html#line-height

"The minimum height consist of a minimum height above the block's baseline
  and a minimum depth below it, **exactly as if each line box starts with a
  zero-width inline box with the block's font and line height properties**"

This is not enough?

*suspects going with the root inline model would clarify a lot of things*

-- 
http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/contact
Received on Sunday, 18 April 2004 15:50:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:29 GMT