> Does anyone have any thoughts on CSS version selectors? They would be nice to have for future browsers, but would be useless for a long time. Also, as you said, this assumes browser makers wouldn't abuse the selector. One flaw: the selector doesn't specify browsers as far as *how much* of the CSS version they support. Because of this, I think it should be brought down to selector level. I'm not sure, but I think this capability is already in CSS. If I remember right, browsers are to skip selectors if they don't support the given value, and use the next instead, as such: ul#navigation { position: fixed; position: absolute; } Maybe I've got it backwards. > html::css2 #main { > color: #fff; > background-color: #fff; > text-shadow: #000 0px 0px 5px; > } If we were to do something at version level, it might be better with @css2, so that whole blocks of CSS rules could be put together. ________ "Irony is a voluntary survey with required fields." ~ Dris ~Received on Friday, 31 October 2003 13:48:13 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 11 September 2008 23:28:23 GMT