On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, David Woolley wrote: >> >> ...which we want to style as: >> >> <dl> >> <::pseudo> >> <dt>...</dt> >> <dd>...</dd> >> </::pseudo> > > This seems to me to be an argument in favour of an explicit container > element. I believe such proposals have actually been made, although > normally on the mistaken grounds that this grouping isn't already > implied. CSS should never try to back-propagate changes to the structure of the language it is styling. If it does, it just shows a limitation of CSS. See the last three paragraphs of: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Oct/0346.html -- Ian Hickson )\._.,--....,'``. fL U+1047E /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. http://index.hixie.ch/ `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Friday, 31 October 2003 04:50:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:24 GMT