Ian Hickson wrote: > ...which we want to style as: > > <dl> > <::pseudo> > <dt>...</dt> > <dd>...</dd> > </::pseudo> > <::pseudo> > <dt>...</dt> > <dd>...</dd> > </::pseudo> > <::pseudo> > <dt>...</dt> > <dd>...</dd> > </::pseudo> > </dl> > > The questions are: > > * which element is the ::pseudo a pseudo-element of? > * what syntax do you use to say you want to group them like that? > > A solution could be: > > dl::pseudo(from the earliest ungroupped dt, > including all the dts that immediately follow it, > including all the dds that immediately follow _that_, > and stopping just before the next dt or the end of parent) > > ...although of course that's rather verbose. > May be a better syntax would be: dt::before or even dt::outside { /* specify that the ::before or ::outside would group the DT and * some elements after, in some way (using some syntax) */ } I'm still maiking myself familiar with the spec and I'm not sure if this approach is even "interesting"... ? -- StanimirReceived on Friday, 31 October 2003 06:48:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:24 GMT