W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2003

Re: CSS21 16.5 Capitalization text-transform

From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 12:02:50 -0400
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.J.20031017120014.0714b198@localhost>
To: Tex Texin <tex@i18nguy.com>
Cc: www-style@w3.org, W3c I18n Group <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>

At 23:11 03/10/16 -0400, Tex Texin wrote:

>Martin,
>
>thanks for the comments.
>
>I guess I don't understand why the behavior for UND doesn't need to be
>mentioned.

Because nobody recommends to use UND in any place. The special case
is not to have any language information, either by absence of any
tags, or by xml:lang=''.

>Aren't specifications better when they precisely define behavior?

Yes, but I guess saying something like 'if you don't have enough
information, use the default mappings' should be good enough.

Regards,    Martin.
Received on Friday, 17 October 2003 14:39:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:24 GMT