W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2003

Re: CSS21 16.5 Capitalization text-transform

From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 12:02:50 -0400
Message-Id: <>
To: Tex Texin <tex@i18nguy.com>
Cc: www-style@w3.org, W3c I18n Group <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>

At 23:11 03/10/16 -0400, Tex Texin wrote:

>thanks for the comments.
>I guess I don't understand why the behavior for UND doesn't need to be

Because nobody recommends to use UND in any place. The special case
is not to have any language information, either by absence of any
tags, or by xml:lang=''.

>Aren't specifications better when they precisely define behavior?

Yes, but I guess saying something like 'if you don't have enough
information, use the default mappings' should be good enough.

Regards,    Martin.
Received on Friday, 17 October 2003 14:39:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:24 GMT