W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2003

Re: CSS21 16.5 Capitalization text-transform

From: Tex Texin <tex@i18nguy.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 23:11:00 -0400
Message-ID: <3F8F5DC4.E27D085C@i18nguy.com>
To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Cc: www-style@w3.org, W3c I18n Group <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>

Martin,

thanks for the comments.

I guess I don't understand why the behavior for UND doesn't need to be
mentioned.
Aren't specifications better when they precisely define behavior?

I guess I like even my unknowns nicely organized... ;-)
tex

Martin Duerst wrote:
> >3) The reference to 2070 should be upgraded to rfc 3066.
> >Also, what should occur if the empty language tag is specified for the
> >language
> >in XML? Use the default conversion or perform no conversion? What if the
> >tag is
> >"UND"?
> 
> I don't think we need to mention 'UND'. For missing/empty language tags,
> the default conversion is fine.
> 
> Regards,     Martin.

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------
Tex Texin   cell: +1 781 789 1898   mailto:Tex@XenCraft.com
Xen Master                          http://www.i18nGuy.com
                         
XenCraft		            http://www.XenCraft.com
Making e-Business Work Around the World
-------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 16 October 2003 23:11:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:24 GMT