Re: OT: Reply-to

* Dris wrote:
>This is off topic, but I'd like to know why the list doesn't use 
>Reply-to in the headers.  I've seen it in countless other lists.  With 
>Reply-to, replying to someone's message will automatically put 
>www-style into the TO: field.  Several times I've accidentally sent 
>messages to other users in the list instead of the list itself.  A 
>little frustrating.  Would this be possible to add to the www-style 
>message list?

http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Reply-To%3A+munging%22

Received on Friday, 21 November 2003 21:40:09 UTC