> I have repeatedly lobbied for a third alternative which I recall David Baron > proposing originally. This alternative would tokenize the maximum initial > tokenizable sequence of characters and would parse the maximum initial > sequence of tokens matching the current 'stylesheet' production (or > equivalent). That would be much easier than implementations having to have forwards compatible error handling at both token and grammar level! It's guaranteed that if implementations have to tokenize *anything* as valid, they will each do so in different ways, as the examples of grammar error handling show. MichaelReceived on Friday, 28 February 2003 07:34:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:20 GMT