Re: ID selector via attribute?

> (I'd also propose that syntax like :matches(+ foo) NOT be allowed - so 
> that whatever is in the parentheses must be a self-contained selector, 
> like :matches(# + foo). The behavior of :matches without a # would be 
> equivalent to adding "#" AND a 'descendent selector' (the space in "a b 
> {foo}"), not just a "#", at the beginning.)

That's a good idea, as it's much more consistent than having dangling 
combinators.

Michael Day

YesLogic Pty. Ltd.