- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 06:15:06 -0400
- To: fantasai <fantasai@escape.com>
- cc: www-style@w3.org
> If you answered three, read part II of > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2001Jun/0006.html I answered three. Then I read that mail. Then I wondered yet again how :before and :after can possibly make any sense when applied to a replaced element, given that the CSS2 spec makes it pretty clear that the boxes generated by these pseudo-elements are children of the box generated by the element they are applied to. Which is quite impossible for replaced elements, no? Boris -- Windows 95: (noun): 32 bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit operating system originally coded for a 4 bit microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company, that can't stand 1 bit of competition.
Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2002 06:15:07 UTC