Daniel Glazman wrote: > Well, it is IMHO a very good thing. But I just regret to be informed > so late ! Why does the information come only now to the CSS+FP WG ??? That's my fault. I worked for time to time on this project and now work during my spare time on SAC. > We (EDF) have built in Java a complete STTS parser - and STTS reuse > the CSS grammar - and could have given some interesting ideas and > clues. Our software could even have been a proof of concept for SAC. > > I'll send comments on the API itself later on. I already have a Java parser implementation of SAC, but I'm waiting for comments on the API itself before releasing the parser. The C version is also important for browser (Opera, Mozilla, Amaya, ...) but I don't have time to develop it. Philippe.Received on Monday, 25 October 1999 05:27:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:54:00 GMT