- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@fas.harvard.edu>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 10:43:49 -0500 (EST)
- To: www-style@w3.org
The definition of line-height in the spec has some problems. In this explanation I refer to computed values of line height only, because inheritance is clearly defined (but poorly understood), since complicating things with inheritance rules would make things only more confusing. In section 10.8.1 of CSS2, in the definition of line-height [1], the spec says: If the property is set on a block-level element whose content is composed of inline-level elements, it specifies the minimal height of each generated inline box. (It then continues by describing its meaning on inline-level elements, with which I agree.) This produces very strange results, because it means that a section of smaller text within a paragraph, that has a smaller line-height (to start) and that is baseline aligned would increase the height of the line-box, because the smaller font-size (with the same line height, because of the above) would make the leading considerably larger, and thus enlarge the line-box at the bottom since half the leading goes on each side of the inline box. I think what was meant was that it specifies the minimal height of each line box, not each inline box. However, this says nothing about vertical alignment in the case where the line-box height is smaller without this rule. Thus I think the rule should be the following: If the property is set on a block-level element whose content is composed of inline-level elements, it specifies the line-height of an anonymous inline box that contains all of the contents (in the normal flow) of the block-level element. This anonymous box also has the font properties of the block-level element, so all other inline boxes are vertically aligned within it. David Baron [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/visudet.html#propdef-line-height
Received on Sunday, 10 January 1999 10:43:51 UTC