W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 1998

Re: OPINIONS WANTED: regexps in CSS?

From: Eric A. Meyer <emeyer@sr71.lit.cwru.edu>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 1998 09:29:34 -0500
Message-Id: <v03102800b12c4f8f26bc@[129.22.138.152]>
To: www-style@w3.org
>RECAP
>=====
>Of the replies to the list so far, Todd, Braden, Aymeric, Me, Ian, and Carl
>have been in favour of including regexp in CSS2, Eric said he saw no harm,
>Bert, Tim, Stephanos and Steven have replied but not given their view, and
>Victoria has been against it.

   I just want to reiterate (because I'm in a pedantic mood this morning)
that I see no harm SO LONG AS regexps aren't necessary to the construction
of a style sheet, or even particularly important to the same.  If
non-power-users can create perfectly valid and powerful style sheets
without the use of regexps-- if I can do the same things without regexps as
I can with them, albeit in a less compact fashion-- then I'm in favor of
including them.  If not knowing how to construct regexps means that major
or fundamental capabilites are closed off, then I'm against it.

                                   -- EMeyer

--
 One of the opening credits says "based  | Eric A. Meyer  #  eam3@po.cwru.edu
 on an idea by the Spice Girls," but     | http://www.cwru.edu/home/eam3.html
 this should in no way be confused with  |       Hypermedia Systems Manager
"based on an idea by Robert Oppenheimer."|           Digital Media Services
        --CNN movie reviewer Paul Tatara |  Case Western Reserve University
Received on Wednesday, 11 March 1998 09:29:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:53:54 GMT