Lee, > While that's a good definition, typesetting practice /never/ uses "em" > as vertical measurement; an em is a horizontal measurement only, and an > "ex" is the vertical measurement. This makes measurements based on > fonts size work with compressed an/or fat fonts. Ok. So, would you argue for not allowing "em" to be used in any vertical measurement? E.g., to set a uniform border width that scales with the font size, 'em' is very useful: P { border: thick red 1em } I have much respect for typographical tradition, but it is seldom consistent and always changing (the term 'em' is a good example of that). I think 'em' is too useful to be limited to horizontal measurements only and this is reflected in the CSS1 specification.. -h&kon H å k o n W i u m L i e howcome@w3.org W o r l d Wide W e b Consortium inria §°þ#¡ª FRANCE http://www.w3.org/people/howcomeReceived on Sunday, 20 July 1997 17:29:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 27 April 2009 13:53:50 GMT