W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 1997

Re: Backwards compatibility of new selectors (was: Color mo

From: Neil St.Laurent <neil@bigpic.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 1997 13:54:28 -0600
Message-Id: <199712022045.NAA00921@underworld.bigpic.com>
To: Douglas Rand <drand@sgi.com>
CC: www-style@w3.org
> Not an argument for breaking bc.  As above - the spec is not easy to
> follow.  It is not suprising that nobody has it right.  

If you are referring to the grammar used by CSS then I could probably 
provide a real grammar for the language -- the one we are using to 
parse CSS2.  The grammar provided by the specification I find to be 
laid out very bad and has errors in it.
| Mortar: Advanced Web Development <http://mortar.bigpic.com/>
| Neil St.Laurent                  <mailto:stlaurent@bigpic.com>
| Big Picture Multimedia
Received on Tuesday, 2 December 1997 15:48:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:26:45 UTC